Wednesday, May 12, 2010

IX Annual Worldwide Forum on Education and Culture






1-3 December 2010 in Rome, Italy




Dear Friends and Scholars,

We would like to remind you of the Call for Papers for the IX Annual Worldwide Forum on Education and Culture. You have one more week to send in your abstract. This year’s theme is “Uniting Cultures Through Education: Case Studies and Classroom Curriculum.” The major focus will be on practical applications and case studies for the classroom.

Deadline for all proposals is 21 May. We have already received more than 50 submissions, and we know of many others that will be coming in. Last year, we received 200 and could accept only 60.

There will be a welcome and keynote address on the evening of 1 December, followed by two full days of presentations and panels on 2-3 December.

We invite abstracts from all disciplines and on multiple levels. Please visit our website for complete details as well as an online submission form: www.theworldwideforum.org. We apologize in advance if you receive multiple copies of this message; we have sent the announcement to those who attended the congress in each of the previous four years.



Sincerely,


Bruce Swaffield
Founder/Director

Worldwide Forum on Education and Culture

Bruce C. Swaffield, Ph.D.

Professor, School of Communication & the Arts

Regent University

1000 Regent University Drive

Virginia Beach, VA 23464-9800

Phone: 757.352.4732

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Distance Education's Rate of Growth Doubles at Community College

April 13, 2010, 03:54 PM ET
Distance Education's Rate of Growth Doubles at Community College
By Mary Helen Miller

Distance education is growing quickly at community colleges, according to the results of a study published by the Instructional Technology Council. For the 2008-9 academic year, enrollment in distance learning at community colleges grew 22 percent over the 2007-8 academic year, up from a growth rate of 11 percent in the previous year.

The Instructional Technology Council, which is affiliated with the American Association of Community Colleges, conducted its annual survey by e-mail and received responses from 226 community colleges. The 22 percent growth from 2007-8 to 2008-9 is somewhat higher than the 17-percent growth that the Sloan Consortium noted for all distance education from fall 2007 to fall 2008 in a recent report. Overall enrollment in higher education grew less than 2 percent during that time.

Fred Lokken, associate dean for the Truckee Meadows Community College WebCollege and author of the technology-council report, said he thinks that one reason distance education has grown more quickly at community colleges than it has in general is because community colleges are more enthusiastic about it than universities are.

Most respondents cited the economic downturn as the main reason for growth in online enrollment, and other respondents said that the growth was typical or was a result of new enrollment efforts. Community-college enrollment has increased in general with the downturn, and Mr. Lokken said that online courses are particularly appealing to people who are job hunting.

“They now see the online classes giving them the greatest flexibility, given the crises they’re facing their lives,” Mr. Lokken said.

The survey also found that for administrators, the greatest challenge in distance learning was a lack of support staff needed for training and technical assistance. In regard to faculty, the administrators who responded to the survey said, workload issues were the biggest obstacle. For students, the institutions' greatest challenge was preparing them to take classes online.

When distance education first became common about 10 years ago, completion rates for online courses were about 50 percent, but survey findings indicate that they are now up to 72 percent. For face-to-face learning, completion rates are only a little higher, at 76 percent.

Federal Agenda for Open Online Courses

From the Chronicle of Higher Education

April 12, 2010, 05:00 PM ET
Agenda for Open Online Courses Can Go Forward, Federal Officials Say
By Marc Parry

Washington ¬ Education Secretary Arne Duncan laid out the Obama Administration's open-education agenda in Politico last year: an ambitious plan to spend $500-million on developing freely available, high-quality online courses. This great course giveaway attracted both buzz and skepticism in education-technology circles.

It was all part of the president's landmark push to invest $12-billion in community colleges, a sum that got drastically reduced in the legislative sausage-making process that ended with an overhaul of the nation's student-loan system. So is the online agenda dead, too?

Federal officials insist it isn't¬although one community-college lobbyist is skeptical.

On a White House blog post about the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HR 4872), which included the student-loan changes, Brian Levine, deputy domestic policy adviser to the vice president, had this to say about online education:

"The legislation provides new funding for community colleges to develop online courses, build partnerships with local employers, and take other steps to help students get the skills and credentials they need to succeed."

Pressed for details on Monday, Hal Plotkin, a senior policy adviser in the U.S. Education Department, confirmed that the specific plan to spend $500-million on online courses was stripped out of the bill. And "to my knowledge," he said, the bill that passed doesn't explicitly mention open, online courses.

"As the White House blog accurately states, however, this legislation does enable us to move forward with our plans related to open online courses," Mr. Plotkin said in an e-mail message.

Exactly how this might happen, and how much might get spent, is fuzzy. Mr. Plotkin suggested some money for online courses could come from $2-billion that the reconciliation bill did include for community colleges. The money, which Mr. Plotkin said is intended to help dislocated workers, will flow through the Department of Labor.

"The Department of Education and the Department of Labor are working now to collaborate on developing the most effective way to use those resources, and our expectation is that we will be able to move forward with the agenda that Secretary Duncan has previously outlined," he said. Including the open online courses? "Yes."

Before joining the Education Department last June, Mr. Plotkin worked as a trustee for the Foothill-De Anza Community College District in California and as a journalist whose lengthy résumé includes serving as a founding editor of the public-radio program Marketplace. His new portfolio includes open educational resources, and his remarks on that subject kicked up Twitter buzz during a talk at last week's meeting of William and Flora Hewlett Foundation grantees at Yale University.

In an interview, Mr. Plotkin confirmed one other tidbit that emerged during the conference. The Hewlett foundation, the dominant philanthropic player in open education, has entered into a formal agreement with the Education Department. "The department has accepted a gift of consulting services from the Hewlett foundation, which allows the foundation to provide us with advice and information as we move forward in this area," Mr. Plotkin said.

Before you get too excited, though, listen to another perspective on what's going on.

It’s "not inconceivable" that some of the $2-billion could pay for online courses, said David S. Baime, senior vice president for government relations and research at the American Association of Community Colleges.

"But it’s not at all the thrust of this," he said. "It doesn’t appear to be much the intent of this new program. And it’s certainly not at all what was envisioned in the $500-million open online program. Nothing like it."

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Worldwide Forum on Education and Culture December 2010

Sessions or Panel Proposals

Conference Theme: Uniting Cultures Through Education: Case Studies and Classroom Curriculum



Worldwide Forum on Education and Culture December 2010





1. No Charge for Extra Pillows: Degenderization and Androgynous Socialization



This could be a panel discussion on the role of professional women globally and the concept "Are Women Persons?"

This could also be a cross cultural curriculum discussion on how women studies are handled cross-culturally, and the challenge of androgynous socialization.

I have started this research and do teach androgynous socialization concept in a Women's Study Course.



Sociologically the gender distinction does not exist, and person is defined as an individual human being with reference to her or his social relationships and behavioral patterns as conditioned by that culture.



The purpose of this paper is to open the door for "Instructional" models for collaboration in virtual worlds. Such a topic would generate interest in virtual collaboration. We would note global diversity, similarity, belief, misconceptions based on culture, language, experience, biblical concepts.



Such a proposal could change the nature of how women's identity courses are taught, and the possible consideration if we should be teaching individual gender descriptive courses. After all, we teach women's courses; should we identify male gender courses globally or should we be teaching "androgynous socialization?" Part of the research and presentation process would be to send a questionnaire to various participants asking their thinking and concerns on the subject.





2. "Heart over Mind" vs Mind over Heart



This is an extension of the presentation at the Forum, December 2009, where the discussion of "Heart over Mind" was well received and mentioned throughout the Forum.



This presentation will focus on the pedagogy of teaching in both dimensions, and take into mind, that many professors are truly regulatory oriented as to requirements for their classes. Is this universal on a global basis? What are the advantages and disadvantages of both concepts? Is one way better than another? How do colleagues view these concepts" Are they action oriented or philosophically oriented - another conference, another "wordy" discussion?" Is this what we should be looking at in higher education? Should students have more free will, more self authority as they handle their individual responsibilities? Should there be a Montessori method to higher education?



I feel this is a topic, continually in-process. Certainly, it does matter when one is discussing physics or another is discussing the state of health care, or does it? Should the issues of ethics, above-board negotiations and under-the-table negotiations be brought into such classroom and online discussions?



Why are there issues of unethical behavior and actions among students as they reach "maturity?" Are we as educators "missing the boat?" Do we need more understanding of "heart over mind," or must we become more authoritarian through mind over heart?



This presentation on a global basis could lead to newer development of such curricula. Part of the research process will include questionnaires sent out to educators on a global basis.



This presenter would welcome panel members who have diverse and challenging views.



Caroline S. Westerhof, Ph.D.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Resource for Twitter & HU300

Stephanie Litz shares this link regarding HU300 and folk music.

http://www.loc.gov/folklife/teachers/subjects.php

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Stephanie Litz's Ning!

Look what Stephanie Litz is doing in her SS360 American Women's course! She's using Ning.com for her upcoming class. Take a look here:

http://kaplanamericanwomenlitz.ning.com/